Article |
| Asia Pacific Journal of Corpus Research Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 31-60 |
| Abbreviation: APJCR |
| e-ISSN: 2733-8096 |
| Publication date: 31 August 2020 |
| Received: 15 July 2020 / Received in Revised Form: 5 August 2020 / Accepted: 13 August 2020 |
| DOI: https://doi.org/10.22925/apjcr.2020.1.1.31
|
Relative Clauses in a Modern Diachronic Corpus of Singapore English |
| Kit Mun Lee (National University of Singapore) |
| Copyright 2020 APJCR
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Abstract |
| This paper investigates changes in relativization in Singapore English broadsheet newspapers from 1993 to 2016. One of the first diachronic studies in Singapore English (SgE), it also explores corresponding data from the diachronic Siena-Bologna (SiBol) news corpus. As SgE is in the endonormative stabilization phase in Schneider’s (2007) Dynamic Model of postcolonial Englishes, divergence from British English (BrE) is to be expected. In this study, the dataset is a new Singapore English Newspaper (SEN) corpus compiled from local news articles in 1993, 2005 and 2016, and the corpus tool employed is Sketch Engine. The results reveal changes in relativization practices in SEN over the given period, many of which occur in a similar pattern as those identified in SiBol, albeit at varying rates of change. Most significant of these include a sharp decline in the which relativizer in restrictive relative clauses with non-animate antecedents, complemented by a rise in that. The change has been so rapid that although which relative clauses were more common than that clauses in 1993, that has subsequently overtaken which for both the corpora. One shift in SEN that is different from SiBol is the increase in frequency of non-restrictive relative clauses in SgE. The likely motivators for the changes in the two varieties are identified as colloquialization, densification and prescriptivism. The effect each of these factors could have had on the varieties are discussed, as well as the implications that the findings have on our understanding of the evolutionary status of SgE as a postcolonial variety. |
Keywords |
| Diachronic Corpus, Relative Clauses, News Writing, Postcolonial Variety, Singapore English |
References |
| Aarts, B., Close, J., & Wallis, S. (2013). Choices over time: Methodological issues in investigating current change. In Aarts, B., Close, J., & Wallis, S. (Eds.), The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora (pp. 14-45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alsagoff, L., & Ho, C. L. (1998). The relative clause in colloquial Singapore English. World Englishes, 17(2), 127-138. Ball, C. N. (1996). A diachronic study of relative markers in spoken and written English. Language Variation and Change, 8(2), 227-258. Biber, D. (2003). Compressed noun-phrase structures in newspaper discourse. In Aitchison, J., & Lewis, D. M. (Eds.), New Media Language (pp. 169-181). London/New York: Routledge. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman. Collins, P., Borlongan, A. M., & Yao, X. (2014). Modality in Philippine English: A diachronic study. Journal of English Linguistics, 42(1), 68-88. Collins, P., Yao, X., & Borlongan, A. (2014). Relative clauses in Philippine English: A diachronic perspective. In Vandelanotte, L., Davidse, K., Gentens. C., & Kimps, D. (Eds.), Recent Advances in Corpus Linguistics: Developing and Exploiting Corpora (pp. 123-146). Amsterdam: Brill-Rodopi. Deterding, D. (2007). Singapore English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Grafmiller, J., Szmrecsanyi, B., & Hinrichs, L. (2018). Restricting the restrictive relativizer. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(2), 309-355. Gries, S. T., Bernaisch, T., & Heller, B. (2018). A corpus-linguistic account of the history of the genitive alternation in Singapore English. In Deshors, S. C. (Ed.), Modeling World Englishes: Assessing the Interplay of Emancipation and Globalization of ESL Varieties (pp. 245-279). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Gut, U., & Coronel, L. (2012). Relatives worldwide. In Hundt, M., & Gut, U. (Eds.), Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide: Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes (pp. 215-241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Hinrichs, L., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2007). Recent changes in the function and frequency of standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language & Linguistics, 11(3), 437-474. Hinrichs, L., Szmrecsanyi, B., & Bohmann, A. (2015). Which-hunting and the Standard English relative clause. Language, 91(4), 806-836. Hoffmann, S. (2018). I would like to request for your attention. In Kaunisto, M., Höglund, M., & Rickman, P. (Eds.), Changing Structures: Studies in Constructions and Complementation (pp. 171-196). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Hundt, M., & Mair, C. (1999). “Agile” and “uptight” genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 4(2), 221-242. Hundt, M., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2012). Animacy in early New Zealand English. English World-Wide, 33(3), 241-263. Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Busta, J., Jakubicek, M., Kovar, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychly, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1, 7-36. Lee, S. L. (1997). Handbook on the Use of English. Singapore: Singapore Press Holdings. Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N. (2009). Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Leech, G., & Smith, N. (2006). Recent grammatical change in written English 1961-1992: Some preliminary findings of a comparison of American with British English. In Kehoe, A., & Renouf, A. (Eds.), The Changing Face of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 185-204). Amsterdam: Brill-Rodopi. Mair, C. (2015). Cross-variety diachronic drifts and ephemeral regional contrasts: An analysis of modality in the extended Brown family of corpora and what it can tell us about the New Englishes. In Collins, P. (Ed.), Grammatical Change in English World-wide (pp. 119-146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Mukherjee, J., & Gries, S. T. (2009). Collostructional nativisation in new Englishes: Verb-construction associations in the International Corpus of English. English World-Wide, 30(1), 27-51. Mukherjee, J., & Schilk, M. (2012). Exploring variation and change in new Englishes: Looking into the International Corpus of English (ICE) and beyond. In Nevalainen, T., & Traugott, E. C. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English (pp. 189-199). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Newbrook, M. (2003). Features of the relative clause in Singapore English. In Deterding, D., Low E. L., & Brown, A. (Eds.), English in Singapore: Research on Grammar (pp. 67-76). Singapore: McGraw Hill. Partington, A. (2010). Modern Diachronic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (MD-CADS) on UK newspapers: An overview of the project. Corpora, 5(2), 83-108. Rayson, P. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519-549. Schneider, E. W. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schneider, E. W. (2010). Developmental patterns of English. In Kirkpatrick, A. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes (pp. 372-384). London: Routledge. Sigley, R. (1997). The influence of formality and channel on relative pronoun choice in New Zealand English. English Language and Linguistics, 1(2), 207-232. Suárez-Gómez, C. (2014). Relative clauses in Southeast Asian Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics, 42(3), 245-268. |
The Author’s Address |
| First and Corresponding Author Kit Mun Lee Lecturer Centre for English Language Communication National University of Singapore 10 Architecture Drive, #03-13, 117511, SINGAPORE E-mail: elclkm@nus.edu.sg |
